#TCMxTTH - Quiet Power in Action: How I Built Influence Without Changing Who I Am
- Apr 17
- 5 min read

"Jayita, when you speak, you bring so much value. You need to speak more."
I had heard some version of this more times than I can count. And every single time, I smiled, nodded — and felt something quietly deflate inside me.
Not because it was unkind. It wasn't. But because I knew something the person saying it didn't.
I was speaking. Deliberately. Selectively. Every time I opened my mouth in that room, it was because I genuinely believed I had something that would move the conversation forward. This wasn't fear or hesitation. It was a conscious choice — one I'd always thought of as professional maturity. Don't add noise. Add value.
What I hadn't seen yet — and honestly, I'm still not sure I can fully name what it cost me — was that my intention was completely invisible to the people around me.
They weren't seeing a professional who chose her words carefully. They were seeing someone who spoke once, maybe twice, drawing their own conclusions about why. The meaning they gave to my selective participation had nothing to do with what was actually happening inside my head.
That was the gap. Not in my capability. Not in my thinking. In the distance between what I meant — and what they were seeing.
I call it the Interpretation Gap. And the day I understood it changed not just how I worked, but what I now spend my life helping other women see.
The Myth I Was Living Inside
For most of my career, I held onto something that felt completely reasonable.
If I do excellent work, it will speak for itself.
I carried this across geographies, across hierarchies, across 22 years of work I was genuinely proud of — leading HR across 12 countries in the Asia Pacific, navigating global roles spanning energy, life sciences, and workforce solutions. For a long time, it held. Performance got noticed. Responsibility expanded. Results opened doors.
Then came the feedback. Speak more. Be more visible. Put yourself out there.
So I tried. I pushed myself to contribute even when I had nothing worth adding. I worked at being louder, more frequent, more present in the performative sense. And for a while, I told myself this was growth.
But it was exhausting. Every room felt like a rehearsal for someone else's role. I wasn't growing. I was disappearing — slowly, politely, into someone else entirely.
One day I was just tired. Tired of the feedback. Tired of the effort. Tired of how little of it felt like me.
Excellence, it turned out, was not the differentiator — not for mid-career professionals and beyond. Legibility was.
The question being answered wasn't who is most capable? It was who do we see as ready? Those are not always the same question. Often, they are not even close.
I had spent years perfecting my answer to the first. I had barely begun to understand the second.
The Turning Point — When I Discovered the Interpretation Gap
For over two decades, I sat in rooms most professionals never see.
Succession planning meetings. Promotion calibrations. The conversations behind closed doors where careers get quietly decided in thirty minutes by people who think they are being objective — and mostly aren't.
I watched something happen, again and again, that I could not un-see.
A brilliant, capable woman would lose a promotion to someone demonstrably less talented. Not because of what she had done. Because of what the room had registered about her. Her work was excellent. Her presence in the minds of the decision-makers — faint.
Then it happened to me.
A colleague and I — equally capable, equally experienced, equally committed. But she had spent years quietly, deliberately building relationships with the people who now sat in that room. She had sponsors. She had visibility where it counted. I had done excellent work, largely in private, and assumed that would be enough.
I didn't lose because I was less capable. I lost because the system doesn't reward what it cannot see. It just doesn't.
That was the moment I stopped being surprised by the Interpretation Gap — and started studying it.
The Skill Nobody Told Me Was a Skill
Here's what I've come to understand after years on both sides of those rooms — first as an HR leader making decisions, now as an executive coach working with women who are ready but not yet being seen as ready.
Leadership perception is not a personality trait. It's not something extroverts are born with and introverts must make peace with missing. It's a skill. Learnable, buildable, refineable — like any other professional capability worth developing.
It starts with one shift in question. Most high-performing professionals walk into a room thinking: what do I want to say? The shift is to ask instead: what are they currently seeing — and what do I need them to see?
That's not manipulation. It's just communication, taken seriously.
The second move was making my thinking visible, not just my output. The quiet professional's trap is delivering results in silence — the work arrives, polished and complete, with no trail of the reasoning that produced it. Decision-makers can't sponsor what they can't see being built. So I started letting people into my perspective before the conclusion. Not performing. Just narrating, briefly and precisely, what I was seeing and why it mattered.
The third shift was the hardest — owning the narrative of my own presence. Not self-promotion in the way that made me cringe. Something quieter: how I entered a conversation, how I framed a contribution, how I made sure my perspective landed with the weight it deserved. I stopped waiting to be discovered. I started making it easier for the right people to see what was already there.
None of this asked me to become someone else. It asked me to become clearer.
What Quiet Power Actually Looks Like in Practice
When I made these shifts, nothing changed dramatically. It rarely does with quiet power.
What changed was legibility. Conversations that had previously moved past me started to include me — not because I was louder, but because my presence had shape. Decision-makers who had once overlooked me began to seek out my view. Not because I'd changed what I thought. Because I'd changed how clearly it arrived.
I see the same shift happen in the women I coach. There's always a moment — sometimes mid-session, sometimes weeks later — when something clicks. When a woman realises the ceiling she's been pushing against was never made of glass. It was made of interpretation. And interpretation, unlike personality or the volume of your voice, is something you can learn to shape.
She doesn't become louder. She becomes clearer. And clarity, it turns out, is its own kind of power.
The Reframe
Quiet was never the problem.
It was never your introversion, your measured pace, your preference for depth over noise. Those aren't liabilities. They never were.
What built the ceiling was the interpretation of quiet. The meaning others gave to your selectivity, your stillness, your commitment to saying something real. A meaning you never intended, never endorsed — and perhaps never knew was forming, in rooms you weren't in, in conversations you weren't part of.
The Interpretation Gap is real. I've seen it in calibration rooms, in promotion decisions, in my own career. But it is not permanent.
Because here is what I know — from those rooms, from my own stumbling through this, and from every woman I've had the privilege of coaching:
Capability was never the issue.
You already know you're ready. The question was never whether you had what it takes. It was always whether they could see what you already are.
And that — is fixable.
Curator’s Note
This article introduces a sharp and nuanced insight into professional growth—the “interpretation gap” between capability and perception. It challenges the myth that excellence alone drives visibility, positioning clarity of expression as the true lever of influence and leadership presence.
About the Author




Comments